Respectively. In terms Last Database of the political system, the main dispute was the one that had the legislative system as its axis. The fundamental conflict centered on the possibility of altering the so-called "mirror legislative system" in which two chambers must approve Last Database each bill and both can function as the initial or review chamber. The consensus that reached two thirds is that of the commitment to an asymmetric Last Database bicameralism, with a political chamber in which the bills originate and a second chamber that, in practice, I would function as reviewer for almost all projects.
Both chambers Last Database will play central roles for the nomination of authorities and to proceed with constitutional accusations. In terms of the form of the State, the proposal, which had Last Database cross-cutting support from political forces, including various right-wing conventional forces, consisted of the formation of a "regional State" with a higher level of decentralization. Beyond the importance of the proposals for Last Database these reforms, there are few who maintain that these are the issues that mobilize voters ( barely 1% of those who would vote for rejection place changes in the.
Legislative Branch as Last Database their main motivation) and , in the case of regionalization, this will probably mobilize votes for approval. On the other hand, although a relevant series of definitions was incorporated in this aspect, there are numerous reforms that could not be agreed by two thirds and that were left for Last Database future laws. For example, the electoral system was not established in the Constitution. In addition, the norm that established the supramajoritarian quorum for constitutional reforms also failed to pass the plenary session. Last Database Lastly, the Fundamental Rights Commission achieved a slightly higher percentage of success than the Environment Commission, obtaining.