Example Of An Essay Critique
Note how the thesis statement classifies the form of the work (writings by immigrants) and identifies the characteristics of that form of writing (tradition, adaptation, and identity) that the essay will discuss.
example of an essay critique
Download Zip: https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Ftweeat.com%2F2u1Kxl&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AOvVaw2bt9JxddbaqdLUwnbDl0CN
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this essay are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of NursingAnswers.net. This essay should not be treated as an authoritative source of information when forming medical opinions as information may be inaccurate or out-of-date.
This is IvyPanda's free database of academic paper samples. It contains thousands of paper examples on a wide variety of topics, all donated by helpful students. You can use them for inspiration, an insight into a particular topic, a handy source of reference, or even just as a template of a certain type of paper. The database is updated daily, so anyone can easily find a relevant essay example.
There are a variety of ways to structure a critique. You should always check your unit materials or blackboard site for guidance from your lecturer. The following template, which showcases the main features of a critique, is provided as one example.
Briefly summarise the main points and objectively describe how the creator portrays these by using techniques, styles, media, characters or symbols. This summary should not be the focus of the critique and is usually shorter than the critical evaluation.
This section should give a systematic and detailed assessment of the different elements of the work, evaluating how well the creator was able to achieve the purpose through these. For example: you would assess the plot structure, characterisation and setting of a novel; an assessment of a painting would look at composition, brush strokes, colour and light; a critique of a research project would look at subject selection, design of the experiment, analysis of data and conclusions.
This evaluation is written in formal academic style and logically presented. Group and order your ideas into paragraphs. Start with the broad impressions first and then move into the details of the technical elements. For shorter critiques, you may discuss the strengths of the works, and then the weaknesses. In longer critiques, you may wish to discuss the positive and negative of each key critical question in individual paragraphs.
To support the evaluation, provide evidence from the work itself, such as a quote or example, and you should also cite evidence from related sources. Explain how this evidence supports your evaluation of the work.
Tip: Critical reflections are common in coursework across all disciplines, but they can take very different forms. Your instructor may ask you to develop a formal essay, produce weekly blog entries, or provide short paragraph answers to a set of questions. Read the assignment guidelines before you begin.
Develop a clear argument to help your reader understand what you learned. This argument should pull together different themes from your analysis into a main idea. You can see an example of a thesis statement in the sample reflection essay at the end of this resource.
Students looking for free, top-notch essay and term paper samples on various topics. Additional materials, such as the best quotations, synonyms and word definitions to make your writing easier are also offered here.
EssayEdge significantly improves each essay using the same voice as the author. The only way to evaluate editing is to compare the original essay with the edited version. We significantly improve essays both for clients who write poorly and for clients who write well.
These essays are well organized and contain the perfect amount of concrete detail. Allowing the reader to learn about you by illustrating your qualities through relevant memories is a very effective technique in essay writing. In addition, your use of one professional and one personal narrative gives the reader a strong sense of your character, both in and out of the workplace.
I also adapted sentence structure, vocabulary, and syntax in many places, always with the goal of improving clarity and readability. Although I did not encounter any major problems with your word choice or level of English (something you were concerned about), I have nonetheless offered alternative wording choices so that your essay can be as effective as possible. See the text of each essay for examples of the changes I propose.
In the revised conclusion, I have more carefully described the unique elements of your leadership philosophy, including your willingness to work with others, your emphasis on shared goals, and your ability to delegate authority and to motivate your teammates. Your essay does a good job of illustrating your use of these techniques, and I have given them greater prominence in my edit.
Linking of A and B. All argumentative papers require you to link each point in the argument back to the thesis. Without such links, your reader will be unable to see how new sections logically and systematically advance your argument. In a compare-and contrast, you also need to make links between A and B in the body of your essay if you want your paper to hold together. To make these links, use transitional expressions of comparison and contrast (similarly, moreover, likewise, on the contrary, conversely, on the other hand) and contrastive vocabulary (in the example below, Southerner/Northerner).
Although you may run across instructors who find the casual style of the original example refreshing, they are probably rare. The revised version sounds more academic and renders the statement more assertive and direct.
Thus, what at first appears to be a blatant contradiction among Socrates'various claims is fairly easily remedied if we interpret the relevant passagesin the Crito as making the claim in ii rather than the claim in i above. This interpretation is supported not only by thefact that it helps to reconcile Socrates' seemingly contradictory claims, butalso by the fact that Socrates' examples of obedience to the state over one'sown objections all involve having to endure something, rather thanhaving to do something. He speaks in Crito 51b, for example, ofhaving to "endure in silence whatever it instructs you to endure, whetherblows or bonds, and if it leads you into war to be wounded or killed, you mustobey." Though he does not explicitly formulate his claim as in ii above,his focus is clearly on the issue of having to endure somethingprescribed by the state, over one's own objections. Therefore, it is consistentwith the text to interpret him as making only the claim in ii, which is fullycompatible with his claim that one must never do wrong, and with his claim thatunder certain conditions one should refuse to do something the stateorders (such as refusing to capture someone for an unjust execution, orrefusing to cease carrying out your divine mission as long as you live).
Notice how, in describing the problem, I try to elucidateit, rather than just summarizing it. Summaryis not explanation. Instead, I try to make clear where exactly the tensionsamong the various claims seem to arise and why, andhow they apply to Socrates' own case. I've tried to go well beyond thesuperficial statement of the problem in the essay question, to illuminate anddevelop it.
Whether or not you agree with that particular argument, you can see thedifference between bringing the discussion to that level of detail and merelystaying on the surface. So even if you would have taken a different position,the point is that a good paper would still be engaging with the issues at thatlevel of depth, rather than remaining on the surface. If you think Socratesreally is contradicting himself, for example, you might then also discuss thedistinctions I pointed out, but then argue for an interpretation along thelines of the first interpretation instead, despite the inconsistencies withother things he says. (Of course, you'd have to be able to give an argument forwhy the text should be understood in that way, despite the fact that Socrateswinds up with rather glaringly conflicting claims on that reading.)
When you are asked to compose a critique essay by your college professor, do not start by seeking some weak parts or saying why you have disliked the movie or suggested course reading. Basically, it is a formal analysis where you have to use evaluation. In terms of content, it can be a paragraph even, theater production, a musical performance, or a philosophical concept. Learning how to write a critical essay, take your time to learn more about the source and the concept you are processing. Depending on your discipline and subject, it can vary from two page to ten pages essay writing in length. Always take time to read through your grading rubric twice to see what additional requirements may be necessary. If you have any questions, talk to your academic advisor first and request additional materials to learn more about the author or the school of thought you have to work with.
The most important is to understand the purpose of a critique essay before you start! Sometimes defined as the response paper, this type of writing should explain what emotions and thoughts have been born in your mind as you have processed specific information. You might also encounter critique writing when working with peer-reviewed sources, which also represent critique essay writing as the experts exchange their opinions. As a college student, you may have to work with this type of writing by offering your thoughts and analysis. The purpose here is to explain the strengths and the weaknesses that you have encountered, talk about the bias (if relevant) and mention the limitations that you have found when reading the text, watching the movie, or listening to a piece of music.
The general critique essay format does not have strict guidelines. It will always depend on the writing style that has been chosen. For example, MLA and APA styles do not have anything specific for a piece of critical writing, except for the use of citations and references to support the most important points. Speaking of structure, critique guidelines will require the following parts: